The Co-Production of Scientific Advice and Decision Making Under Uncertainty:Lessons from the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy

Anna Scolobig, Reinhard Mechler, Nadejda Komendantova, Wei Liu, Dagmar Schröter, Anthony Patt

Abstract


On 22 October 2012 seven members of the Italian Major Risk Commission were found guilty of 29 persons manslaughter and of 4 injuries in relation with the earthquake that hit L’Aquila, a town in Central Italy, in the year 2009. The members were verdict to six years in prison for violating their obligations to adequately analyseseismic risk and to provide clear, correct and complete information, which might have saved many people’s life. The case has not been concluded jet and so far the debate focused on the scientific, legal and communicative aspects of the verdict, while the institutional ones, including the co-production of scientific advice and decision making, received less attention. We argue that the presence of deep epistemic uncertainty coupled with responsibility overlaps of scientists-turned-decision-makers, is fundamental to understanding the event and the legal aftermath. Another relevant institutional aspect is the concern of the national and local authorities that the population would over-react to anything other than a reassuring message. We discuss the consequences of this framing of the emergency management problem in terms of public control rather than public safety. As risk science continues to grapple with the challenge of communicating uncertain information to decision-makers and citizens, it becomes more important to understand the co-production processes that shape how scientific advice is used for decisions on the ground.


Keywords


epistemic uncertainty, science policy co-production, emergency communication, communication paradoxes

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Amato, A., Cocco M., Cutrera G., Galadini F., Margheriti L., Nostro C., Pantosti D. (2013): The l’Aquila trial, Geophysical Research Abstract, Vol. 15 EGU2013-12140. URL : http://www.egu2013.eu/ (31 July 2013)

Aspinall, W. (2011): Check your legal position before advising others, Nature 477: 251.

Cartlidge, E. (2012): Prison terms for L’Aquila experts shock scientists, Science 338:451-452.

Cash, D., Borck J., Patt A. (2006): Countering the 'loading dock' approach to linking science and decision making: a comparative analysis of ENSO forecasting systems, Science, Technology, and Human Values 31: 465 – 494.

De Marchi, B. (2013 a): Risk Governance and the integration of scientific and local knowledge. In Fra Paleo, U. (ed.) Risk Governance. The articulation of hazard, politics and ecology. Berlin: Springer (forthcoming).

De Marchi, B. (2013 b): La sentenza di l’Aquila riaccende il dibattito sul rapporto tra scienza e potere politico, Epidemiol Prev 37 (1): 89-91.

Funtowicz, S., Ravetz J. (2008): Post-Normal Science. The Encyclopedia of Earth. URL: http://www.eoearth.org/article/Post-Normal_Science. (31 July 2013)

Gasparini, P., Leone A. (2012): Decidere nell’incertezza, AMRA Rivista Quadrimestrale 4: I, Napoli. ISSN 2240-1520 URL: http://www.amracenter.com/doc/pubblicazioni_riviste.htm (31 July 2013)

Grandori, G., E. Guagenti (2009): Prevedere i terremoti: la lezione dell’Abruzzo. Ingegneria Sismica, XXVI (3): 56-61.

Hall, S.S. (2011): Scientists on trial: At fault? Nature, 477: 264-269.

Marzocchi, W. (2012): Putting science on trial, Physics World December 2012: 17-18.

Masera, L. (2013): Giudice penale e scienza: il problema della prevedibilita’ dei fenomeni sismici. University of Milano Bicocca, On-line conference streaming URL: http://www.unimib.it/open/eventi/LAquila_-il-racconto-oltre-la-sentenza/7471963267212041234 (31 July 2013)

Mc Nie, E. (2007): Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature, Environmental Science and Policy 20: 17-38.

Nosego, N. (2010): Italy puts seismologists on the dock, Nature 465: 992.

Ozerdem, A., Rufini G. (2013): L’Aquila reconstruction challenges: has Italy learned from its previous earthquake disasters? Disasters, 37 (1): 119-143.

Otway, H., Wynne B., (1989): Risk Communication: Paradigm and Paradox, Risk Analysis, 9:141-145.

Quarantelli, E.L., Dynes, R.R. (1972): When disaster strikes (It isn’t much like what you’ve heard or read about). Psychology Today: 67-70.

Ropeik, D. (2012): The L'Aquila Verdict: A Judgment Not against Science, but against a Failure of Science Communication, Scientific American URL: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/10/22/the-laquila-verdict-a-judgment-not-against-science-but-against-a-failure-of-science-communication/ (31 July 2013)

Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R. (2007): The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environmental Science and Policy 10: 5-16.

Tallacchini, M., (2013): Le politiche della scienza: la cultura mancante. University of Milano Bicocca, On-line conference streaming http://www.unimib.it/open/eventi/LAquila_-il-racconto-oltre-la-sentenza/7471963267212041234

Wyss, M. (2013): Lessons from the conviction of the L’Aquila seven: the standard probabilistic earthquake hazard and risk assessment is ineffective, Geophysical Research Abstract, Vol. 15 EGU2013-3402. URL: http://www.egu2013.eu/ (31 July 2013)

Zalin, M., Butti, M. (2013): Responsabilita’ degli esperti per il terremoto dell’Aquila, Il Sole 24 Ore. URL: http://www.diritto24.ilsole24ore.com/penale/primiPiani/2013/01/responsabilita-degli-esperti-per-il-terremoto-di-laquila-un-primo-commento-alla-sentenza-.html (31 July 2013)


Comments on this article

View all comments