Towards novel community-based collaborative disaster management approaches in the new information environment: an NGO perspective

Marc van den Homberg, Martijn Neef

Abstract


Large scale natural and man-made disasters are complex events involving many stakeholders. Despite the structures the national and international humanitarian system provide, still many collaboration and information gaps between stakeholders, levels of operations and phases in the disaster management cycle occur. In the recovery phase, communities are insufficiently involved and comprehensive knowledge about the affected environment is missing leading to mismatches between efforts of the different actors and the community needs and prolonged recovery trajectories at higher costs. The rapidly changing and new information environment consisting of mobile services, social media, social networks, crowdsourcing and online communities offers new opportunities to engage with communities but also new challenges to stay abreast of all that’s communicated digitally. New collaborative approaches will be required to diminish these gaps. The EU funded COBACORE develops a collaborative platform that facilitates the interaction between members of the professional, affected and responding communities. It helps to register needs, capacities, activities and acquire situational information by the whole, and provides facilities to obtain better matching of needs and capacities. Adoption and ownership by communities is essential and should be investigated for example by building and piloting a localized version of the platform. Such a localized platform should enable both digital and non-digital ways of interaction given that many disaster affected communities live in resource-poor environments. The platform can be used as well as a cooperative development game for the responding community and professionals to improve their cooperation and coordination skills. Although NGOs are not social computing organizations, it is recommended to expedite developing a basic social computing understanding (and possibly capability) in-house so that digital technologies can be incorporated into relief and recovery activities more easily.


Keywords


disaster recovery, new information environment, community-based, collaboration gaps

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Bankoff, G.; Frerks, G.; Hilhorst, T. (2004): Mapping vulnerability, Disasters, Development and People, London: Earthscan.

Caritas Internationalis (2007), Emergency guidelines: principles, structures and mechanisms and toolkit: URL = http://www.caritas.dk/sites/default/files/attachments/ci_emergency_guide.pdf (15 October 2014).

COBACORE deliverable D1.1, Scope and Requirements (2014): URL = http://cobacore.eu/vde/cobacore-innovation-station/progress-so-far/public-deliverables/D1.1, Scope and Requirements (15 October 2014).

Crutchfield, M. (2013): Phases of Disaster Recovery: Emergency Response for the Long Term, URL = http://www.umcmission.org/Find-Resources/New-World-Outlook-Magazine/2013/March-April-2013/0430-Phases-of-Disaster-Recovery-Emergency-Response-for-the-Long-Term (15 October 2014).

Di Loreto, N. ; Mora, S. ; Divitini, M. (2012), Collaborative serious games for crisis management : an overview, IEEE 21st International WETICE, 352.

Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, Volunteer Technology Communities: open development (2014): URL = https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/gfdrr.org/files/documents/Volunteer%20Technology%20Communities%20-%20Open%20Development.pdf (15 October 2014).

Goolsby, Rebecca (2013), Cybersecurity, crowdsourcing, and social cyber-attack, Policy memo series, volume 1: URL = http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/cybersecurity-crowdsourcing-and-social-cyber-attack (15 October 2014).

Harris, K.; Keen, D.; Mitchell, T. (2013) When disasters and conflict collide, Improving links between disaster resilience and conflict prevention: URL = http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8228.pdf (15 October 2014).

Kellett, J.; Sparks, D. (2012), Disaster Risk Reduction: Spending where it should Count: URL = http://www.globalhumanitarianassistance.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/GHA-Disaster-Risk-Report.pdf (15 October 2014).

Klein, N. (2008): The Shock Doctrine, New York: Henry Holt and Company Inc.

Meier, P. (2014): 11th ISCRAM 2014, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, May 18-21, 2014, keynote speech.

UNDP Post disaster needs assessment, URL = http://www.undp.org/content/brussels/en/home/partnerships_initiatives/results/EU-UNDP-PDNA.html (15 October 2014).

van den Homberg, M.J.C.; Meesters, K.; van de Walle, B. (2014): Coordination and Information Management in the Haiyan Response: observations from the field, Humanitarian Technology: Science, Systems and Global Impact 2014, HumTech2014, Procedia Engineering 78: 49 – 51.

Quarantelli, E. L. (1999): The Disaster Recovery Process: What We Know and Do Not Know from Research. Disaster Research Center Preliminary Papers, Newark: University of Delaware.

Sphere Handbook - Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response (2011): URL = http://www.spherehandbook.org/ (15 October 2014).

World Bank (2012): Information and Communications for Development 2012: Maximizing Mobile = http://www.worldbank.org/ict/IC4D2012 (15 October 2014).