Enhancing Public Resilience: A Community Approach

Anna Olofsson, Mikael Linnell, Catrin Johansson, Erika Wall, Susanna Öhman

Abstract


The overall aim of the paper is to explore two key areas in crisis management: (a) the role of local communities in crisis preparedness and response, and (b) how to involve the citizens in this task.Specifically we ask: What areas are important to develop in order for public resilience to be enhanced? The study has a broad scope and utilizes a novel design since it takes four stakeholder perspectives into consideration: the perspectives of municipal safety coordinators, members of voluntary organizations, semiorganized individuals, and nonorganized individuals. In total 33 in-depth interviews were undertaken in three different Swedish municiplaities.Seven major themes related to enhanced public resilience were developed in the analytic process: a) Collaboration: formal and informal practices, b) Specific competences and general abilities, c) Collective efforts and individual self help, d) Education and empowerment, e) Traditional communication versus digital media, f) Individual motivation and involvement, and g) Generation and age. From these themes four policy-level recommendations aimed for civil servants and similar public authority representatives. The recommendations consist of four key words, or ‘The four In:s; Inclusive, Interested, Insistent, and Inventive’. The study is part of an extensive research project, Public Empowerment Policies for Crisis Management, funded as part of the European Community's Seventh Framework Program.

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Act (2003:778): Act on civil protection. Government of Sweden. Retrievable in Swedish from https://lagen.nu/2006:544.

Act (2006:544): Act on municipal and county council measures prior to and during extraordinary events. Government of Sweden. Retrievable in Swedish from https://lagen.nu/2006:544.

Aguirre, B.E. (2006): On the Concept of Resilience, Preliminary Paper #356. Disaster Research Center (DRC), University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.

Atkinson, R. & Flint, J. (2004): Snowball sampling, in Lewis-Beck, M.S., Bryman, A. & Futing Liao, T. (eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications Inc.

Bennett, S. (2012): Innovative Thinking in Risk, Crisis, and Disaster Management. Franham, England: Gower Publishing Limited.

Berger, P. & Neuhaus, R.J. (1996): To empower people. From state to civil society. Second edition, Washington D. C., USA: The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Press.

Bierhoff, H.W. (2002): ). Prosocial behaviour, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.

Bloom, L. (1993): Transcription and coding for child language research: the parts are more than the whole, in Edwards, J. A. & Lampert, M. (eds.) Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research, Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brunsma, D.L., Overfelt, D. & Picou, S.J. (2007): The sociology of Katrina. Perspectives on a modern catastrophe, Lanham, Maryland, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Burgess, J.P. (2012): Annex A – Conceptual considerations for the ETTIS project – J. Peter Burgess Contribution, in D.1.2. A working definition of societal security. European Security Trends and Threats in Society (ETTIS). Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), European Community, Seventh Framework Programme. Retrievable from content/uploads/2012/03/D1_2.pdf

Chandra, A. et al. (2010): Understanding community resilience in the context of national health security. A literature review, Working Paper prepared for the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, RAND Corporation. Retrievable from http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR737.html.

Chandra et al. (2011): Building Community Resilience to Disasters. A Way Forward to Enhance National Health Security, Technical Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, RAND Corporation. Retrievable from http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR915.html.

Clarke, L. (2002): Panic – Myth or reality?, Contexts, 1(3): 21-26.

Clarke, L. (2006): Worst cases. Terror and Catastrophe in the Popular Imagination, Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

COM(2009)82: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions, A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters, Commission of the European Communities. Retrievable from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0082:FIN:EN: PDF.

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008): Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications.

ESRIF Final Report (2009): European Security Research & Innovation Forum (ESRIF). Retrievable from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/security/files/esrif_final_report_en.pdf.

FEMA (2011): A Whole Community Approach to Emergency Management: Principles, Themes, and Pathways for Action, Federal Emergency Management Agency, FDOC 104-008-1. Retrievable from: https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/23781

Government bill (2001/02:158): Government bill on society´s safety and preparedness, Government of Sweden. Retrievable in Swedish from the Ministry of Defence Web site, http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c4/32/60/03c0eac6.pdf.

Government bill (2005/06:133): Government bill on cooperation during crisis, Government of Sweden. Retrievable in Swedish from the Ministry of Defence Web site, http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/06/04/68/49d6475a.pdf.

Government bill (2007/08:92): Government bill on reinforced emergency preparedness: For safety´s sake, Government of Sweden. Retrievable in Swedish from the Ministry of Defence Web site, http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/10/11/51/45e238c5.pdf.

Heath, R.L. & O’Hair, D.H. (eds.) (2009) Handbook of risk and crisis communication, New York, USA: Routledge.

Hsieh, H-F. & Shannon, S. (2005): Three approaches to qualitative content analysis Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277-1288.

Johansson, C. & Linnell, M. (2012): A literature review on community approaches that involve the public in crisis management – Fostering community resilience through coproduction by response organisations and citizens, Report prepared for the research project Public Empowerment Policies for Crisis Management (FP7-284927). Retrivable from: www.projectPEP.eu.

Jupp, V. (2006): Purposive sampling, The SAGE dictionary of social research methods, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications Inc.

Kvale, S. (2007): Doing Interviews, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications Inc.

Lindell, M. & Perry, R. (1992): Behavioural foundations of community emergency planning, Washington, USA: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

Linnell (2013): Community approaches involving the public in crisis management. A literature review. Risk and Crisis Research Centre (RCR) Working Paper Series 5, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.

López-Marrero, T. & Tschakert, P. (2011): From theory to practice: building more resilient communities in flood-prone areas, Environment and Urbanization, 23(1): 229-249.

Magis, K. (2010): Community resilience: an indicator of social sustainability, Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 5(23): 401-416.

McAslan, A. (2011): Community resilience: Understanding the concept and its application. A discussion paper prepared for the Torrens Resilience Institute, Adelaide, Australia. Retrievable from http://torrensresilience.org/images/pdfs/understanding%20community%20resilience.pdf.

Mayring, P. (2000): Qualitative content analysis, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2): article 20

NRC (2011): Building community resilience through private-public collaboration, National Research Council (NRC), Washington, USA: National Academies Press.

Olofsson, A. (2007): Kriskommunikation i ett heterogent samhälle – lika för alla eller till var och en efter behov? Sociologisk forskning, 44(3): 6-29.

Olofsson, A. & Öhman, S. (2007): Views of risk in Sweden: Global fatalism and local control – An empirical investigation of Ulrich Beck’s theory of new risks, Journal of Risk Research, 10(2): 177- 196.

Olofsson, A. & Rashid, S. (2011): The White (Male) Effect and Risk Perceptions: Can Equality Make a Difference? Risk Analysis, 31(6): 1016-1032.

Perry, R. & Lindell, M. (2003): Understanding citizen response to disasters with implications for terrorism, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 11(2): 49-60.

Quarantelli, E. (1993): Human and group behavior in the emergency period of disasters: Now and in the future, Preliminary Paper #196. Disaster Research Center (DRC), University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.

Schoch-Spana, M., Franco, C., Nuzzo, J.B. & Usenza, C. (2007): Community Engagement: Leadership Tool For Catastrophic Health Events, Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefence Strategy, Practice, and Science, 5(1): 8-25.

Scottish Government (2013): Building community resilience. Scottish guidance on community resilience, Government of Scotland. Retrievable from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2013/04/2901.

Slovic, P. (2000): The perception of risk, London, UK: Earthscan.

Swedish Civil Defence League (2004): The best knowledge of how to cope in vulnerable situations, Civilförsvarsförbundet (Civil Defence League), Solna, Sweden.

Twigg, J. (2009): Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community: A guidance note. Version 2, November 2009. Aon Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre, University College London, London, UK. Retrievable from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1346086/1/1346086.pdf.

UK Cabinet Office (2011): Strategic national framework on community resilience, United Kingdom. Retrievable from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ file/60922/Strategic-National-Framework-on-Community-Resilience_0.pdf.

United Nations (2005): Disaster Risk Reduction, Governance and Volunteerism, UN Volunteers and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Policy Paper prepared for the World Conference on Disaster Reduction, 18-22 January 2005, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. Retrievable from http://www.nirapad.org.bd/admin/soft_archive/1308135800_DisasterRriskRreduction.%20Governan ce%20and%20Voluntarism.pdf .

Wall, E. (2014): Individuals’ interest in preventing everyday accidents and crises: a Swedish explorative study of the importance of motivation, Human Technology. An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, (in press).

Zinn, H. & Pierce, C. (2002): Values, gender, and concern about potentially dangerous wildlife, Environment & Behavior, 34(2): 239–256.